<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A better system?!? don&#8217;t think so.</title>
	<link>http://www.kurioso.com/2005/06/a-better-system-dont-think-so.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: AGH</title>
		<link>http://www.kurioso.com/2005/06/a-better-system-dont-think-so.html#comment-507</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kurioso.com/2005/06/a-better-system-dont-think-so.html#comment-507</guid>
					<description>&lt;em&gt;This voice recognition system is a real problem if you happen to have an accent, for instance I have a British accent, and the software never seems to reconize anything I say, even the simple words &quot;yes&quot; or &quot;no&quot; seem completely foreign to &quot;Andrea&quot;. I end up having to try and speak like a Canadian (its quite difficult really) so that I can get some response from the damn thing. It usually takes about 3 or 4 tries just to get past the yes or no stage, not to mention trying to relay the code for the voucher. Really annoying...&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This voice recognition system is a real problem if you happen to have an accent, for instance I have a British accent, and the software never seems to reconize anything I say, even the simple words &#8220;yes&#8221; or &#8220;no&#8221; seem completely foreign to &#8220;Andrea&#8221;. I end up having to try and speak like a Canadian (its quite difficult really) so that I can get some response from the damn thing. It usually takes about 3 or 4 tries just to get past the yes or no stage, not to mention trying to relay the code for the voucher. Really annoying&#8230;</em>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.kurioso.com/2005/06/a-better-system-dont-think-so.html#comment-461</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kurioso.com/2005/06/a-better-system-dont-think-so.html#comment-461</guid>
					<description>I share your thoughts.

And not only do you get a delay when you say something it doesn't understand, but even if you do give one of its &lt;i&gt;understood&lt;/i&gt; responses, it will still ask,

&quot;I think you said, 'Get me a real fvcking person, Andrea.'  Is this correct?&quot;

So either way, every selection you make has at least a re-entry process.  The only way they could make this worse is to implement the wait message as,

&quot;Thank you for calling BlahBlahBlah. Your call is important to us and, in a joint partnership with your mobile carrier, will be answered by the next available representative after we've charged you an acceptable minimum amount of airtime.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share your thoughts.</p>
<p>And not only do you get a delay when you say something it doesn&#8217;t understand, but even if you do give one of its <i>understood</i> responses, it will still ask,</p>
<p>&#8220;I think you said, &#8216;Get me a real fvcking person, Andrea.&#8217;  Is this correct?&#8221;</p>
<p>So either way, every selection you make has at least a re-entry process.  The only way they could make this worse is to implement the wait message as,</p>
<p>&#8220;Thank you for calling BlahBlahBlah. Your call is important to us and, in a joint partnership with your mobile carrier, will be answered by the next available representative after we&#8217;ve charged you an acceptable minimum amount of airtime.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Cheng</title>
		<link>http://www.kurioso.com/2005/06/a-better-system-dont-think-so.html#comment-462</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kurioso.com/2005/06/a-better-system-dont-think-so.html#comment-462</guid>
					<description>basically Fido has said &quot;great news we're switching to a voice system so you can say what you want instead of pressing numbers!&quot; except saying what you want doesn't work as kathryn described. what's more, they do things like ask for your password and a less knowledgeable person would think that they have to SAY it (which i'm sure you _could_ do).

at least with Fido it says up front you can say &quot;agent&quot; to get to a real person. i had a similar problem in the states with AT&amp;T and i just couldn't get to a real person. i spent about half an hour navigating their entire menu system and just could not get to someone. eventually i really was just swearing into it.

i think if you're going to design a system like that, someone should put in recognition for the swear words and realize &quot;ok, time to send that person to a real agent&quot;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>basically Fido has said &#8220;great news we&#8217;re switching to a voice system so you can say what you want instead of pressing numbers!&#8221; except saying what you want doesn&#8217;t work as kathryn described. what&#8217;s more, they do things like ask for your password and a less knowledgeable person would think that they have to SAY it (which i&#8217;m sure you _could_ do).</p>
<p>at least with Fido it says up front you can say &#8220;agent&#8221; to get to a real person. i had a similar problem in the states with AT&#038;T and i just couldn&#8217;t get to a real person. i spent about half an hour navigating their entire menu system and just could not get to someone. eventually i really was just swearing into it.</p>
<p>i think if you&#8217;re going to design a system like that, someone should put in recognition for the swear words and realize &#8220;ok, time to send that person to a real agent&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
